Comments for De Rerum Mysterio

Comment on The Need for the Bad News by kraml

kraml — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:42:27 +0000

Have you done any reading in/on the New England Transcendentalists? BTW, I love the “Possibly related posts: (automatically generated): * `Michael Jackson’s This Is It’ to open worldwide.” He he he . . . .

Comment on The Need for the Bad News by Neoclassical

Neoclassical — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:05:09 +0000

Oops. Thanks.

Comment on The Need for the Bad News by unknowing

unknowing — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:47:15 +0000

Filed under T.S. Eliot . . .

Comment on Marxist Imagination by Neoclassical

Neoclassical — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:00:21 +0000

You must live in South America.

Comment on Marxist Imagination by unknowing

unknowing — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:26:16 +0000

Marx!

Comment on The Un-Neutrality of Questions by Kraml

Kraml — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:13:16 +0000

I found page 393 in Brad Sherman, “Hermeneutics in Law,” The Modern Law Review 51 (1988): 386-402, interesting re: your question. Kraml

Comment on The Un-Neutrality of Questions by Neoclassical

Neoclassical — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:42:22 +0000

I have found him to be far more interesting and acceptable than I had thought.

He sounds to me like Lukacs, for some reason, and I like Lukacs very much.

Comment on The Un-Neutrality of Questions by Kraml

Kraml — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:09:01 +0000

Having fun with Gadamer, eh?

Comment on Seeing Through Many Eyes by metaphysicalrealist

metaphysicalrealist — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:23:49 +0000

I think this is what Weaver is after when he talks about Fragmentation. In order to have knowledge, one must know other people, and thereby know what they know. The thing known is outside of and common to both. If that is true, then post-modernism can’t exist.

After you read _Experiment_, I recommend _History in English Words_ by Barfield.

~MR

Comment on On Cultivation by Neoclassical

Neoclassical — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:07:18 +0000

Sounds like Matthew Arnold.